1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A’s KRW 41,064,141 as well as 5% per annum from March 17, 2016 to February 9, 2017.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties (1) C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) is the owner of the instant plant and its affiliated buildings (hereinafter “instant plant”) and the internal factory machinery, etc., of the Seoul Northern-gu D ground mentbble block.

(2) On September 10, 2009, the Plaintiff is an insurer that entered into an insurance contract on the instant plant and machinery with the Nonparty company as follows.

(1) Insurance types: Non-party company's insurance period:

Since that time, it has been operating a laundry factory with the trade name "F" in the factory of this case.

(4) On October 25, 2012, Defendant Epis Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Epis”) concluded an unmanned security system service contract, such as intrusion identification system, with Defendant B, and provided crime prevention services from around that time.

B. On October 28, 2015, at around 22:21, Defendant A, in a state of mental and physical disability of the instant plant, entered the instant plant in a state of mental and physical disability with the tear gas powder, and stored in the factory, and caused a fire to the whole floor of the factory on the first floor by attaching four stringers to the string in the factory (hereinafter “instant fire”). As a result, Defendant A was indicted for a general crime of fire and fire prevention and was sentenced to three years of imprisonment on January 15, 2016, and on August 18, 2016, the said conviction became final and conclusive on August 26, 2016 by dismissing both the appeal filed by Defendant A and the Prosecutor.

C. The instant fire, the insurance money of which was paid, is the instant case.