A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the actual operator of C Co., Ltd. who had been in the petition-gu B, Cheongju-si, and D is the representative director in the name of the defendant.

1. On January 9, 2017, the Defendant, at the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the head of the F Bank in the Cheongju-gu, U.S., U.S., the Defendant signed D on the “C representative D of the Agricultural Co., Ltd., Ltd., Co., Ltd., Ltd.,” the “Japan KRW million” in the column of the limit of the collateral guarantee, and the “D” in the column of the joint and several sureties, respectively, and submitted D’s signature to the staff of the F Bank, who is aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of continuing guarantee in the name of D, a private document concerning rights and obligations, and exercised the forged letter of continuing guarantee as if it were a document duly formed.

2. On February 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) signed the D’s seal impression issued in advance on D’s name; (b) signed the D’s seal impression on the D’s name on February 28, 2017 at the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the Chungcheongnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; and (c) without authority, for the purpose of exercising as if the Defendant was D, the Defendant was acting as D; and (d) submitted the said certificate to the employee in charge of the office of the Small and Medium Business Corporation who is not aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of continuing guarantee in the name of D, a private document concerning rights and obligations, and exercised the forged letter of continuing guarantee as if it were a document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement of the protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each certified transcript of corporate register, any guarantee certificate of F Bank, any guarantee certificate of the Small and Medium Business Corporation, or F Bank;