A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and a fine of two hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 30, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 3.5 million by a fine of KRW 3.5 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the source of a water source method on November 30, 2011, and on September 17, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and one year of suspended execution due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act by the same court on September 17, 2013.

On May 8, 2016, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol 0.117% from the blood alcohol level around 14:15, driven DCI 100 Obaba, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at 1km from the front day of Suwon-si to the long distance of transfer located in the same Dong-dong.

2. "2016 Highest 7,275".

A. On November 13, 2016, the Defendant driving a three-wheeled vehicle without obtaining a motor device bicycle license on the front side of the Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 19:17.

B. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a holder of FSL125 three-wheeled vehicle.

No automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the three-wheeled vehicle which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place mentioned in the above paragraph (a).

(c)

Defendant 1 was driven under the influence of alcohol by Defendant 1, while driving a three-wheeled vehicle at the time, time, and place specified in the above paragraph (a) above while driving the three-wheeled vehicle at the rear side, Defendant 1 was under the influence of alcohol by Defendant 1, etc., from the head of the police station belonging to the head of the Suwon Police Station, etc. of the water source called upon receiving 112 reports while making a verbal dispute, he/she driven the vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling and snicking on the face.

Due to reasonable grounds to determine a person, it was demanded from around 18:47 of the same day to around 19:17 of the same day to respond to the measurement of drinking at least four times.

Nevertheless, the defendant avoided this and did not comply with a police officer's request for a measurement of drinking without justifiable grounds.

(i) the evidence;