A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who served as a mobile phone salesperson in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon.

1. On November 7, 2015, the Defendant forged a private document and affixed D’s signature to the subscriber column by using the pen device without authority on the application form for the subscription of the LG PP device kept at the above agency. The Defendant signed D’s signature in the subscriber column by stating “D, E”, “NEWless voice 59.9, A168-64,” and “D” in the applicant/subscriber column.

As a result, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forges a copy of the application for membership in the name of D, a private document concerning rights and obligations, and sent the application for membership in the above-mentioned D in an electronic document, and sent it to the employees of LG Plus Office who are aware of the forgery, such as an Internet mail, etc., as if it was a document duly formed.

The application for admission to Chapter 6, such as the list of crimes (1), was forged and exercised by exercising it.

2. Around September 15, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim F, “Around September 15, 2014, the Defendant issued a false statement to the victim F, “I will pay both the value and charge of the Handphone machine on the main part of a week by allowing the Handphone to open the Handphone in four names, and will not claim the fee to the width.”

However, due to pressure on the sales of a mobile phone, the Defendant had no intention or ability to pay the mobile phone fees even if he opens a mobile phone in the name of the victim, since the telecommunications rate and installments that should be paid by opening the mobile phone in the name of the person who is not the victim, have been higher than the monthly wage that the Defendant received, and the Defendant had tried to open the mobile phone in the name of the person who is the victim and resell the mobile phone and receive the mobile phone fees.

As above, the defendant deceiving the victim and issued a written application for the re-issuance of the resident registration certificate from the injured party, and then opened 11 mobile phones, such as the mobile phone list (2) in attached Form 1,52,000, by obtaining a mobile phone delivery in the name of the injured party, by deceiving the victim with the delivery of the mobile phone amounting to 352,00 won.