1. On October 5, 2012, the Defendant’s disposition of non-approval of the additional medical care rendered to the Plaintiff on October 5, 2012, damage to the dives on the side of the region.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 7, 201, the Plaintiff was an employee belonging to two mountain companies, who cut the trees by using a mechanical saw at the work site on September 7, 201, and was at the price of the saw and kneeing on that saw (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. The Plaintiff was diagnosed “B” due to the instant accident, and completed the medical treatment by June 15, 2012 upon filing an application for the medical treatment to the Defendant on September 30, 201.

C. On July 11, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional medical care with the Defendant on July 11, 2012 for “In the instant injury” (hereinafter “instant injury”).

However, on October 5, 2012, the Defendant rendered a disposition of additional medical care approval and non-approval of additional medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff based on the result of the advisory society’s deliberation, that “The pelle flue flue flue flue flue flue flue flue in the left side is irrelevant to disaster and the upper branch of the previous approval.” The Defendant did not recognize the implue flue flue flue flue flue flue in the left side, which is recognized as an additional injury

[Reasons for Recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence 11, Eul evidence 1 through 5, Eul evidence 7, and 8 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The legality of disposition.

A. At the time of the Plaintiff’s assertion, he sawed a saw while using the tree at the time of the instant accident. At the same time, he knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee