The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable because of the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year of imprisonment).

2. The judgment of the defendant shows an attitude against the defendant's perception of his mistake, and the defendant has no record of criminal punishment or criminal punishment of suspension of qualification or higher for the same crime.

However, the defendant, in collusion with A, etc., manufactured and sold goods bearing a trademark similar to the victim's trademark widely known in Korea, thereby infringing the victim's trademark right and acquiring unjust profits. In light of the contents of the crime, the period and scale of the crime, etc., the crime is not good.

In addition, the damage caused by each of the crimes in this case was not recovered.

Considering the circumstances unfavorable or favorable to the defendant as above, the circumstances after the crime, the age of the defendant, sexual conduct, environment, and all other factors of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, the punishment imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable, and therefore, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.