The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The signal to turn to the left at the right-hand lane when waiting for the signal at the left-hand turn of the reasons for appeal was changed to the intersection in the process of making the freight and the car to turn to the right-hand turn at the right-hand lane, making it possible to report the left-hand turn to the right-hand turn, and confirmed the number signal of the traffic police officer and immediately turn to the left-hand turn, and controlled the violation

The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case because it constitutes a crackdown, but the court below erred by misunderstanding the facts.

2. The following circumstances, which are considered comprehensively taking account of the various circumstances revealed in the record and the change of the decision in this case, i.e., even if the defendant's statement is based on the defendant's statement, the defendant went to the left at a two-lane, a two-lane, a two-lane left to the left to the left to the left, in order to turn to the left, and the police officers at the present site stated consistently that they did not have any signal to make a right to the left and have been carrying out traffic adjustment, and the police officers at the present site have consistently stated that they had been carrying out the traffic adjustment. ③ The two-lane, a two-lane, a two-lane, a two-lane, a two-lane right to the left, following the signal of the signal system of the intersection in this case, are turned to the right to the left and turned to the left, and thus, the driver at the right-hand turn, if there is a two-lane road, may not interfere with the way of the vehicle in which the defendant would turn to the left, or may not have any other way to turn the left.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.