1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The circumstances leading up to the instant accident are as follows.

At the time of the accident, on January 2, 2019, at the time of the insured vehicle D E of the insured vehicle of the Plaintiff, the insured vehicle of the Plaintiff at the time of the accident, and around 14:51 on January 2, 2019, at the location of the F apartment complex 4, the left left at the two-lane (section prior to the meeting) of the collision situation, and the vehicle of the Plaintiff, which was left left at the first lane (the two-lane prior to the meeting), did not have any dispute over KRW 20,000, the insured vehicle of the self-paid vehicle of the automobile of the Plaintiff at the time of the collision, and the purport of the entire pleadings, as described in the items of subparagraphs

2. According to the evidence and the video of Gap evidence Nos. 10 and 11 (Plaintiff's vehicle black image) as seen earlier, even though the plaintiff's vehicle made a left turn at the two-lane, which is the left left turn, and made a left turn to the right outside of the guiding line, the defendant's vehicle, which was going on the right side of the driver's vehicle, has shocked the back part of the driver's seat on the right side of the driver's vehicle, and the defendant's vehicle entered first than the plaintiff's vehicle at the intersection, but the plaintiff's vehicle did not turn to the left, and in light of this, the defendant's vehicle tried to go straight on the right side of the driver's vehicle at the time of left turn.

Although the defendant's vehicle was driving in two lanes before entering the intersection, it seems that the plaintiff's vehicle, which had made a left turn to the left pursuant to the new code, could not be anticipated that the defendant's vehicle, which had been one lane, was in a sudden step.

Therefore, it is reasonable to view that the instant accident occurred by the unilateral negligence of the Defendant vehicle driver.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 1,060,000 (i.e., total damages of KRW 1,260,000 x 100% - self-charges of KRW 200,000 - Supreme Court Decision 2015Da236431 Decided January 28, 2016) and the following delay damages.