logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.07.11 2017고단2828
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On April 26, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a violation of road traffic law (drinking) at the Daegu District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act. However, the Defendant’s appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court on June 26, 2018, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 26, 2018.

[Criminal facts]

1. On November 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven an EKaren car without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about about 10 kilometers from Daegu-gu to Daegu-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong, approximately 0 kilometers; (b) around 09:40 on November 15, 2016.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, as a person holding the said car sirens car at the time and at the place specified in paragraph 1, operated the said car sirens car without mandatory insurance.

3. On November 15, 2016, the Defendant, at around 09:40, controlled the charge of operating the said car rental car on the front road of Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and voluntarily accompanied the said car rental car to the large area of the police station in Daegu-dong, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, at around 10:00 on the same day, the Defendant signed the Defendant’s name “F” on the front name of the consent letter of voluntary accompanying without authority for the purpose of using the Defendant’s unlicensed driving to conceal the Defendant’s unlicensed driving, and “F” on November 15, 2016, at around 9, 10 K from Nam-gu to D market.

Having drawn up a written statement stating “F” and signed it in F, the police officers belonging to the large-scale police station of the Daegu East-gu Police Station, which knew of the forgery, submitted the written consent and the written consent as if they were duly formed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the consent form and written statement of voluntary accompanying in the name of F, which is a private document on the proof of facts, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Voluntary accompanying report of a person subject to the violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation and a written statement of voluntary accompanying consent, 1.1.

arrow