logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2016.09.09 2016고정314
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who has driven a B carren vehicle in the course of business by the defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act (after the accident)

On December 07, 2015, the Defendant was at a speed of about 20 kilometers a speed of 20 kilometers a speed from the side of the next hospital, depending on the back road front of the DNA seeds in Sinsan-si C around 05:40 on December 07, 2015.

In such a case, a person engaged in driving of a vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by checking the safety of course and accurately manipulating the steering gear and operating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, when driving a vehicle due to negligence and negligence, the victim E(41) was parked at the point of the accident, and the back of the driver's seat of the driver's seat of the victim E(41) x-rayed by the driver's negligence, and the victim suffered physical damage equivalent to KRW 648,498 in the cost of repairing the damaged vehicle by shocking the front side of the driver's seat of the victim's vehicle. However, the victim escaped without any measure at the scene of the accident.

2. On November 15, 2010, the Defendant was killed in violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) on or around December 22, 2006, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million on or around November 15, 2010, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2.5 million, and the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2.5 million on or around December 27, 2015. However, despite the aforementioned two times of drinking, the Defendant was driving a B car under the influence of alcohol in the influence of alcohol at around 300 meters from the 30-meter radius from the Sinsan-si Embalian alcohol house to the uppermost of the same scenic ridge.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, who is the owner of BKaren vehicle, operated an automobile not covered by mandatory insurance without renewal of expired liability insurance even though it is not possible to operate the automobile.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A E-document;

1. A survey report on actual condition and a report on the detection of a driver engaged in driving;

1. Acts and subordinate statutes making inquiries about criminal history;

arrow