logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2020.04.22 2019고단1838
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

50,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The amount equivalent to the above additional charges.

Reasons

(a)".".". or " South Korea has made a statement, so we have to live in prison at present, because it is one of the drh's own statements. If you have taken several days, you have already completed the trial on a simple medication;

In addition, the responsibility is no longer the principle of prohibition against double Jeopardy, not the responsibility for width test.

Since it is later, it is possible to file an application for a witness in the Korean Bar Association.

The test in which the application for the witness stands shall not have any damage." The witness G has pressured or induced the witness G to make a different statement by stating that the application for the witness will be free from the danger of harm. In the interview after the date of the examination of the witness is designated, the witness G needs to give the defendant her friencing.

There was no first received in the penalty test.

The second is a building up to a square room, but the upper line is going on the upper line.

The defect, "The defendant has a telephone line."

“The witness G refers to “the upper part” and the witness G stands.

The term "", and the defendant again refers to "A and A***." and the witness G "I have obtained".

In full view of the fact that the defendant and witness G appear to have attempted to answer the speech, the statement in the G investigation agency about the criminal facts in this part can sufficiently recognize credibility.

In addition, the Defendant, at an investigative agency based on the details of his telephone conversations, issued a penphone from a person who used a telephone from the victim who purchased the telephone, and provided that he could introduce women, provided that G was permitted to do so, and that G was first engaged in a penphone, and G was found in his hotel room and re-issued once again. At the hotel room, G was not administered a penphone, and the phone was administered in his residence, and all of the crimes of this case were recognized. A written opinion was presented on November 11, 2019, which was the first day before the trial.

arrow