(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.07.16 2018가단317184

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.07.16 2018가단317184

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The party’s relationship (i) Nonparty G (hereinafter “the deceased”) is an employee who worked at the Defendant F (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) H site (final working division: the PPPAT assembly 2 post): on April 18, 2018, died at a acute scarcity (in presumption) around 22:00 on April 22, 2018.

The plaintiffs are successors as siblings of the deceased.

B. The Defendant E is a person who operates an I Hospital (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Council member”) within the Defendant Company’s place of business in accordance with the conclusion of an entrustment contract for health consultation and treatment between the Defendant Company and its executives and employees.

B. (i) The Deceased’s member of the Defendant Council was engaged in the contact work at the Defendant Company H, and around August 14, 2018, around 14:47, the Deceased applied to the Defendant Council on the following grounds: (a) “The her was fright before 1 hour, the her chest was fright, the her was fright, the her blood was fright, and the her was fright, and the her chest was fright, and the her was fright upon the her fright and her

As a result of the internal test of the deceased, the blood pressure of the deceased was measured with 110/70, 242 g/dl, and the urine was suspected (not diagnosed in the previous examination) and the urine was recommended to view the test of the pulpy and the urine coloring urine of the deceased, and the symptoms of the deceased claimed by the deceased at the time were diagnosed as follows: “The symptoms of the deceased were “Isn't have any ple, and they do not have any chromatics, and they do not have any chromatics to the left-hand arm’s length,” and the symptoms of the deceased were diagnosed as “Walk’s salt and tension (S134), Walk’s unknown infection (K297), and F419(F419).”

Then, Defendant E prescribed the Deceased’s “Lodlon”, which is a chronological control, etc.

C. The Deceased’s death (i.e., the Deceased’s death) returned home after leaving his hospital on the same day, but on the following day, the Deceased’s birth was discovered to the Plaintiff D as his birth.

The death of the deceased, who examined the body of the deceased, shall be urgent to the death of the deceased without going through the autopsy.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2012.10.16 2010가합23674

-서울고등법원 2018.12.05 2018누57973

-서울행정법원 2018.07.12 2017구합1391

-창원지방법원통영지원 2019.04.18 2016가합11499

-서울행정법원 2017.11.30. 선고 2016구합51849 판결