logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.12.05 2018누57973
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. On September 13, 2016, the amount of bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 24, 2003, the Plaintiff’s spouse B (CB, hereinafter “the deceased”) entered D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant company”), and the head of the field team, as the head of the field team, performed the duties, such as the sewerage construction work, the field director, etc.

B. On March 16, 2016, the Deceased, after completing work around 18:00 on March 16, 2016, claimed symptoms that the chest was in blood and blood in the Aarma while returning home while driving the company’s vehicle, and driving the company’s vehicle.

Accordingly, E was replaced by driving, and the symptoms of the Deceased aggravated, and the Deceased was sent to the G Hospital emergency room.

C. In light of the crypical pulmonary typology and chronic pulmonary typology analysis in the crypology, the deceased received crypical typical typical typical typical typical typical typical typical typical typological typical typicals, with cardio-human shock symptoms accompanied by cardio-human shock symptoms, the deceased received treatment by inserting the EC (e.g., external circular typical typical typical typical typical typical typical typical typheric typicals, but the deceased died on March 20, 2016, even though the new substitute method was implemented, but did not recover at around 06:30.

In the death diagnosis report for the deceased, the direct death is written in the form of the heart, the loss of the function of the influenite, the middle-line events, and the preceding officers in the form of acute fluorial color.

(hereinafter referred to as “the injury and disease of this case”) D, which caused the death of the deceased, influence color D.

Around June 2016, the Plaintiff filed a claim for the payment of bereaved family’s benefits and funeral expenses with the Defendant. On September 13, 2016, the Defendant’s bereaved family’s benefits and funeral expenses on the ground that “It is not confirmed that the deceased died of the instant injury, but it is not confirmed that the time or volume of work increased, and the stress following promotion omission or acquisition of qualification certificate is determined to an ordinary level, and the deceased was in a state of high blood pressure due to basic illness, and thus, it is difficult for the deceased to recognize the relationship with his duties.”

arrow