beta
Text
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of six months.
(b).
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The Prosecutor’s appeal is unreasonable because the lower court’s sentence (ten months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of probation, and one hundred and sixty hours of community service) is too uneased.
B. The Defendants’ appeal (1) at the time of the original judgment, 2014 Go-dan262 case was solely conducted by Defendant A, and Defendant B did not commit any offense.
(2) The lower court’s punishment against the Defendants is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. At the time of the original adjudication, Defendant A and Defendant B are in a petant relationship with Defendant A and Defendant B, Defendant A, at the house of Defendant B, located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, around April 19, 2014, on the ground that the victim E (the victim E (the age of 45) met one’s petence B) and met one’s face on the ground that the victim E (the age of 45) met one’s petence, Defendant B met the body of the victim on several occasions, and the Defendants met the victim’s body on April 19, 2014, and did not call to B, but move to the victim on any reason.
In the event of this path, I will accept it to human level.
A written statement stating “A” has been prepared, and Defendant A continued to have five times the end of the victim’s life on his hand. A around April 20, 2014, around 02:00, Defendant A asked for a victim’s face at the main point of “G” located in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, for the reason that the victim sought a report. As a result, the Defendants jointly carried out an injury to the victim, such as influorging, sorging, sorging, and sorging, which require approximately four weeks of treatment. (2) The issue of whether the Defendant B’s co-processing was a public health stand, and there was a statement made by the victim E as evidence to this effect, but it is difficult to believe that it is inconsistent as shown in the table below, and it is insufficient to recognize the Defendants’ assertion as evidence to submit other prosecutor. Therefore, this part of the Defendants’ statement is reasonable.