logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.01.10 2019고단1132
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendants are married couple's death.

around May 8, 2012, the Defendants entered into a contract with the Securities and Exchange Co., Ltd., which is a planning real estate company, to purchase KRW 496,50,00 per square meter of Gangwon-do D Forest land at KRW 750,000,000, but did not have ownership transfer. In particular, the aforementioned forests and fields were in a situation where only 15% of their shares can be secured even if the Defendants were to acquire ownership at a place with the total area of 3,353 square meters (per approximately 1,016 square meters). Moreover, the said forests and fields were in a situation where the possibility of development and the possibility of disposal was weak by the so-called Ma.

(2) On December 24, 2012, Defendant A (hereinafter “the instant forest”). Nevertheless, around December 2012, Defendant A recommended a victim E (the age of 51 at that time) who was aware of the fact that he had no experience in land purchase and sale and had been in water at the world, to purchase the said forest continuously and to purchase the said forest at the same time. Defendant B introduced the instant forest contract to the effect that “I wished to purchase the forest by entering into the agreement with the victim at the same time, and that I would like to purchase the forest at the same time, and that I would like to purchase the forest at the same time, and that I would like to purchase the forest at 0 if I would like to purchase the forest at the same time, and that I would like to purchase the forest at the same time as I would like to purchase the forest at the same time, and that I would like to purchase the forest at the same time as I would like to purchase the forest at the same time with the Defendant’s 1’s own own forest at the same time as I’s own forest at this case’s bar.”

However, in fact, the Defendants were unable to own the forest of this case separately as seen above, so that only 15% of ownership can be secured, and the registration of shares by 15% has not yet been completed.

arrow