logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2013.05.14 2013고단344
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Seized evidence subparagraph 1 shall be forfeited from the accused.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. On June 20, 2012, the Defendant entered “B” in the “B” resident registration number column in the name column of the application for Class 1 driver’s license test for the Class I driver’s license of the former driver’s license of the former driver’s license center located in Seojin-gu, 1136, Seojin-gu, Jeonjin-gu, Seoul, with a photograph of the Defendant attached to his name and exercised the forged one copy of the application for the driver’s license for the vehicle under the name of B, which is a private document concerning a certificate of fact with a photograph of the Defendant attached to that name. In other words, the Defendant submitted the forged application form as mentioned above to an unwritten employee who is aware of forgery

B. When the Defendant was arrested at the time, at the same time, and at the place as set forth in paragraph (4) below, and was transferred to the D District Unit of the Ansanan Police Station at around 02:40 on the same day, the Defendant, using a tamp-type color pen to use “B” in the confirmation column for the arrest of flagrant offender with the purpose of exercising the said tamp-type, and affixed a seal on the side, thereby forging one copy of the confirmation letter for the arrest of flagrant offender, which includes the part of the private document in the above B’s name concerning the certification, and submitted it to an unwritten employee who knew of

2. The Defendant, at the time and place of paragraph 1(a) and at the same time and place, presented the application form under the name of B, and the Class B ordinary driver’s license under the name of B, and applied for on-road driving test while driving the vehicle as B.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the test of driver's license by the Commissioner of the North Korean Police Agency through deceptive scheme, and denied official documents.

3. The Defendant is not obliged to obtain the above date and time, the notice of passing the on-road driving test at the place, and the notice of passing the test, and the Class II ordinary vehicle driver’s license.

arrow