logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2017.07.11 2017고단270
자동차관리법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Automobile Management Act by dividing the registration number plate shall be detached, except as otherwise permitted by the Mayor/Do Governor or provided for in other Acts;

Nevertheless, on September 2016, the Defendant returned the registration number plate of the DPoter, which was registered under C in the name of the Mayor/Do Governor, in front of the residence of the Defendant in the south-gu, Dong-gu B and B 301, and removed it by hand without obtaining permission from the Mayor/Do Governor.

2. On November 2016, the Defendant violated the Automobile Management Act by unlawful use of air defense, and unlawful use of registration number plates, attached the registration number plates of D freight cars, which are air hographs, removed, as described in paragraph 1, to the vehicle at the top of the E in order to exercise at the places described in paragraph 1, and used them unlawfully and at the same time.

3. On December 3, 2016, the Defendant posted a registration number plate of a motor vehicle which is an air defense, as described in paragraph 2, to the said motor vehicle, and thereafter exercised the air defense illegally used by operating the said motor vehicle from the front of the Defendant’s dwelling in No. 2 and No. 301 to the front of the budget-based 17, 212 Cheongcheon-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, a budget-based new parking lot, 212, to the front of the Cheongcheon-gu, a budget-based public parking lot.

4. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act is a holder of the said low-priced car.

No one shall operate any motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance on a road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, around December 3, 2016, operated the said passenger car that was not covered by mandatory insurance from the front of the residence of the above Defendant to the roads front of the above Blue House, as well as the said passenger car that was not covered by mandatory insurance from March 4, 2017 to the front of the above Blue House.

arrow