logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.07.06 2017고단1549
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On July 10, 2015, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 4 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Eastern District Court, and on June 21, 2016, the above court issued a summary order of KRW 4 million for the same crime.

[Criminal facts]

1. On May 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) while under the influence of alcohol by around 01:20 on May 8, 2017, the Defendant driven CK3 automobiles in the section of approximately 200 meters from the road front of the trade influent convenience store in Seoul Songpa-gu, Songpa-gu to the front road of Songpa-gu, Seoul, while under the influence of alcohol by around 01:12% without a driver’s license.

2. On May 8, 2017, the Defendant forged a private document and the instant investigation document: (a) controlled the driving of alcohol on the front side of Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul on the road; (b) stated the Defendant’s name “F” in the “road driver’s statement” column of the document in the “road driver’s statement” column; (c) forged the Defendant’s statement in the name of F, a private document on the proof of the fact for the purpose of exercising the Defendant’s signature; and (d) issued the same to the said E, a falsified driver’s statement on the same page, which was forged.

3. The Defendant forged a private signature and signed the above investigation at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, and carried out F as above, and caused the said E to enter F’s personal information, details of violation, etc. in the column for entry of traffic control information on drinking driving by accessing the Transport Police Information Network via PDA (portable session), and subsequently forged F’s private signature without authority for the purpose of signing and exercising the F’s signature in the column for confirmation of the above PDA, and presented it to the above E, who is aware of the forged signature at that place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. G. G.

arrow