logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.07.12 2018나60412
손해배상(자) 청구의 소
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the subsequent order of payment shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal as follows, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. A statement of calculation of damages in attached Form 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance, which added or added, shall be replaced by a statement of calculation of damages in the judgment of the court of first instance

In the fourth 20th end of the judgment of the first instance, “The monthly income (it is deemed that the income equivalent to the daily wage of the ordinary worker can be earned during the said period)” shall be added to the end of the fourth 20th instance judgment from January 1, 203 to the end of January 4, 2043.

The June 8th of the first instance judgment’s “445,837,598 won” is deemed as “473,610,310 won.”

6th of the first instance judgment and 12th of the first instance judgment are as follows.

[A] Plaintiff A: 284,166,186 won (=473,610,310 won x 3/5) : Plaintiff B: 189,44,124 won (=473,610,310 won x 2/5) x 2/5) x 13 of the judgment of the first instance [based ] .. 6 16 through 21 of the judgment of the first instance . 300,66,186 won (i.e., inheritance amount of KRW 284,66,186 won x 3,500,000 won x 3,500,000 won) . . . 16% of the total inheritance amount of KRW 284,500 and 16. 281. . 86% of the judgment of the first instance as to the existence or absence of the obligation of the Plaintiffs from 2016. . 285% of the judgment.

arrow