1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The appeal costs.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except when adding or adding to, the following is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. The following shall be added at the third 5-round end of the judgment of the court of first instance to a part added or written:

C The above facts constituting the crime

6. On 30. 30. A summary order was issued for a fine of KRW 5,00,000 as the Changwon District Court was 201,649.

The fourth 12 parallels in the judgment of the first instance are as follows: “At the rear 12 parallels, 5 to 10 minutes are added without any light device at a place in which pedestrians are prohibited from passing; “60% of the said 15 parallels are as follows; “60% of the said parallels are as follows;” “20% of the said parallels”.

The "attached Form No. 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance" shall be replaced by the "attached Form No. 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance".

Then, “the fact of September 17, 2016,” the five and six pages of the judgment of the first instance, is added to “the fact that the Plaintiff was subject to departure order around July 2018 and was departing from the Republic of Korea abroad at that time.”

The 5th and 10th of the judgment of the first instance shall be replaced by “Plaintiff”, and the 20th and 20th each by “ October 27, 2018” by “ October 19, 2019.” The 6th and 6th of the judgment shall be replaced by “attached Form calculation sheet.”

The June 6th of the judgment of the first instance is 80% “60%” with “80%”; the 7th class “5,614,600 won” with “74,152,800 won”; and the 11th class “40,000,000 won” with “20,000 won.”

The "20,682,878 won" of the 7th trial of the first instance is "91,052,119 won".

7 pages 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be 11 or less as follows:

Therefore, with respect to the Defendant’s unjust enrichment amounting to KRW 91,052,119 and KRW 20,682,878, which was recognized by the first instance court among them, the Plaintiff’s obligation to perform is determined from September 11, 2018 to November 30, 2018, which was the day following the date of delivery of a duplicate of the counterclaim in this case, and from September 11, 2018, as to KRW 70,369,241, which was additionally recognized by the first instance court.