beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except when adding or adding to, the following is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.
2. A statement of calculation of damages in the attached Form of the judgment of the court of first instance, which added or added, shall be replaced by the attached Form of the judgment of the court of first instance.
Each "90%" of the 19th 14th 14th 19 and 5th 14th 14th 200.
The fifth 16th 18th 16th 18th 18th 16th 18th 18th 18th 3,034 out of the deceased’s 365,170 won and the Plaintiff A’s 3,761,630 won out of the Plaintiff’s 3,761,630 won of the treatment expenses. The fifth 19th 12th 12th 6th 12th 2th 2th 20 of the first 1st 1st 1st 30,000 won
The 6th 19th 19th 19th 19th 19th 19 judgment added "the grounds for recognition" to the Daejeon District Court of the first instance and the Incheon District Court's respective inquiry results.
One to five parallels in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be conducted as follows.
"Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay damages for delay at each rate of 50,980,502 won and each of the above amounts to the plaintiff A as compensation for damages from August 20, 2017, which is the date when the accident of this case occurred, to September 6, 2019, which is the date when the judgment of the court of first instance, that is the date when the defendant rendered the judgment of the court of first instance, to pay 5% per annum under the Civil Act and 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the date when the payment is made."
3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims are accepted within the scope of the above recognition and the remaining claims are dismissed without merit. Since the part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant ordering payment exceeding the above recognition amount is unfair, the plaintiffs' claims corresponding to the revoked part are revoked, and the defendant's remaining appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.