beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Joint criminal administration with the accused and C;
A. At around 02:00 on September 23, 2012, the Defendant and C discovered a fdiversified car at the victim E-owned market value of KRW 5.390,000,00, which was parked in the Dakwikset service front of Hong-gun, Hongsung-gun, and the Defendant reported the network next to the Defendant, and C, after opening and entering the front door of the said kwikset-gun’s driver’s seat without a locked base, stolen another’s property by driving the vehicle, leaving the front door by using the vehicle heat with a view to using it.
The Defendant and C discovered that there are 60,000 won in cash 20,000,000,000 won in 20,000,000 won in cash owned by the said victim, and the Defendant continued to drive the said 60,000,000 won in cash 20,000,000 won in 20,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000
B. Fraud, Violation of Specialized Credit Finance Business Act (i.e., the Defendant and C
1. The above one-mentioned 1 when purchasing a trine fed one with a market price equivalent to KRW 800 won at the J convenience point operated by the Hong-gun, Hong-gun on September 24, 2012, which was stolen as referred to in paragraph (a), in writing, and around September 14:25, 201;
A. As Doshed, a new physical G card in the name of G was presented to K, as if it were one’s own card, and was issued with the said three-dimensionaled boomed rice by having it settled as if it were the convenience store employees.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to receive another person's property and used a stolen personal card.
B. At around 14:30 on September 24, 2012, the Defendants purchased 13,500 won or more at the convenience points as described in the above (i) above, she presented the new e-mail card in the G name to K as if he were an employee of the convenience store, and received the above 5-mentioned tobacco.
Accordingly, the Defendant and C.