1. The Defendant’s KRW 12,567,076 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from June 27, 2012 to December 18, 2014.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition (1) B, around 9:35 on June 27, 2012, driven a C-vehicle (hereinafter “A-related vehicle”) and met the part of the Plaintiff’s D-vehicle that was driven ahead of the vehicle in front of the instant A-related vehicle by negligence while neglecting to turn to the left at the right edge from the boundary of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office located in the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Office at the right edge of the workplace, while neglecting to turn to the left.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as the sofinite salt pane, etc., due to the said accident.

(2) The defendant is the insurer of the household vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 5 (if any, including a serial number), the purport before oral argument

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages caused by the accident of this case as the insurer of the instant sea vehicle.

C. The judgment on the defendant's assertion (1) The defendant asserted that the plaintiff was not able to wear the safety belt at the time of the accident of this case, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this, and the above argument is

(2) The Defendant asserts to the effect that it is difficult to recognize the causal relationship between the Plaintiff’s injury and the accident merely because the instant accident is a minor drilling accident. However, in full view of the following, it is recognized that there was a proximate causal relationship between the Plaintiff’s injury and the instant accident, comprehensively taking account of the following: (a) the instant accident was a protruding accident (Evidence 1); (b) the Plaintiff’s vehicle repair cost was required in KRW 3,067,136; and (c) the Plaintiff’s physical appraisal was submitted to the instant court to the effect that the Plaintiff suffered bodily injury, such as the

The defendant's above assertion is without merit.

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the annexed damages calculation sheet shall be the same, and in principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but shall be less than the last month and less than the last month.