(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.06.25 2014가단214349

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.06.25 2014가단214349

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 126,317,63, and KRW 123,017,633 to Plaintiff B, and KRW 2,00,000 to Plaintiff C.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) Defendant D is the E-si around 03:50 on March 30, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as “Korea-Japan”);

A) A driver of the Daejeon Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, driven the road in front of the 319 U.S. P. C. C., on the left side of the vehicle, driving the road in front of the 319 U.S. P. C., and driving the road in front of the 319 U.S. P. S. C., the Defendant: (a) carried the front side of the road in front of the e.g., the front side of the vehicle; and (b) while the Defendant was carrying out a duty of care

2) In the instant accident, F died on April 10, 2014 on the part of the Plaintiff A and B (hereinafter “the deceased”) on the part of the deceased, and the Plaintiff C is the parent of the deceased, and the Federation of Personal Passenger Transport Business Associations of the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) is the mutual aid business entity of the franchising vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry and video of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 10 (including branch numbers if there are branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the facts of recognition as above, the defendants are jointly and severally liable to compensate the deceased and the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the accident in this case as a mutual aid business operator of an illegal and harmful vehicle.

C. Negligence offset: Provided, That the place where the accident of this case occurred is the two-lanes in the vicinity of the crosswalk where signal lights are installed, and the deceased crossings the two-lanes, has the duty of care to safely cross by checking whether there is a vehicle driving on the right and right and right and right and right and right and right and the crosswalks in the vicinity.

However, the deceased, while returning home to the new wall that led to his neglect of such duty of care, is crossing without permission on the road where a safe guard for distinguishing the roadway from the sidewalk is installed.

The accident of this case was caused by the failure to avoid the vehicle under the jurisdiction of the United States.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2018.04.03 2015가단236331

-광주지방법원 2019.04.10 2018가단514113

-부산지방법원 2017.07.20 2016가단356895

-대전지방법원 2016.12.09 2016나106481

-대전지방법원 2015.05.14 2015가단201500