logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.08.25 2016고단1149
특수폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around May 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim D (V, 56 years old), who was in the said gas station in the state of alcohol, to find his house at the C oil station located in Heak-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-si; (b) sought the above office door to enter the said office, and (c) sought the horses from the victim of the son who caused the son’s loss.

Accordingly, the defendant, who had a door of the office by forcing the defendant to take the door of the gas station office, was able to take out the victim's bath, took the victim's bath, taken the friendly (79cm in length) which is a dangerous object carried by the defendant at the time, into his hand, taken the victim's face into one time, taken the part left of the victim's face into the end of provoking, and tried to prevent the defendant from displaying the following, and again took a part of provoking over the victim's face.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

2. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 위 1 항 기재 일시, 장소에서, 폭행사건이 발생했다는 내용의 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 충북 청주 흥 덕경찰서 E 지구대 소속 경위 F에게 “ 개새끼야, 주유소한테 뭘 받아먹었냐

The above F, while speaking, arrested the Defendant as the flagrant offender in the assault case.

For this reason, the Defendant “I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling,”

I. Does Hashea Hashea Hashea Hashea Hashea Hashea Hashea Hashea,

followed. Doing the end of the year in which the fraud was changed;

“In doing so, at the left side of the F, the said F’s left side bridge was taken several times, and the said F used the said F’s desire to take the Defendant on the patrol vehicle, such as displaying a good quantity as the said F would have to put the Defendant on the patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report processing.

(i) the evidence;

arrow