logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.07.07 2015고정4635
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 25, 2015, around 21:30 on August 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) boarded a bus operated by the victim C in front of the office located in the Kimnam-si Kim Jong-si, and (b) caused a difference in the bus fee by the victim, and (c) caused a difference in the victim’s 15 passengers, and (d) caused the victim’s “a bitch or bitch bitch bitch fri on the bitch f

“The term “ was expressed in a large sound.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each legal statement statute to the witness C and D;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning the relevant criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of the facts charged lies in the victim C (46) who is driving at the time and place indicated in the facts constituting the crime, and the Dosan in possession of the defendant who had a victim at a place less than about 1m away from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim who is a driver of a vehicle in operation.

2. The Defendant consistently denies this part of the facts charged, while the Defendant consistently denied the direct evidence that corresponds to this part of the facts charged, is only the victim C’s statement that the Defendant tried to give the victim a bath and to display a mountain, at the time and place specified in the facts charged, at the time and place.

However, the witness D who had observed all of the instant cases was in a situation where the Defendant had been in possession of a bus driver who continued to take a bath to the victim, and thereby could interfere with the driving of the bus.

However, the defendant could not properly hold his body in the bus in operation under the influence of liquor.

arrow