logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.05.12 2015나11711
토지인도 등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal and the plaintiff's incidental appeal are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where Gap submitted at the court of first instance to support the plaintiff's primary argument that the lease contract is terminated, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 42

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim should be accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remainder should be dismissed as there is no reasonable ground.

As the conclusion of the first instance judgment is justified, the defendant's appeal and the plaintiff's incidental appeal are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow