1. The defendant's KRW 30,470,872 per annum against each of the plaintiffs and 5% per annum from June 24, 2009 to June 14, 2017.

Basic Facts

On June 11, 2009, the deceased A (hereinafter referred to as the “the deceased”) was diagnosed on June 24, 2009 as having been in need of pressure treatment through an operation on the ground of hurgical pain, etc., and was conducted on June 24, 2009 by the medical personnel of the Defendant’s hospital to undergo an operation on June 19, 2009, under the diagnosis that it was in need of pressure treatment through an operation on the ground of hurgic hurgic hurgosis and hurgic hurgical hurgephe, which had been used from the medical personnel of the Defendant hospital since then been ordered to suspend the use of hurgical hurge and hurgic hurgic hurg hurg hurg hurg hurg hurg hurg hurg hurd.

On June 23, 2009, the Deceased was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, and received from June 24, 2009 to June 15:30, 2009 to June 20:0, 3 to 20:4 to 3-4 to 4-5 to 4-5 to 3-5 to 4.

On June 25, 2009, on the following day, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital discovered symptoms that the deceased’s satise and do not work well, and on the same day, the 09:18 CT on the same day, found that the Materne had occurred to the deceased who did not have any such symptoms, and conducted the 11:00 to 12:30 on the same day by checking the pharmac pressure of blood species on the surgery, and by conducting the 3-4-5 secondary surgery (hereinafter “the second surgery”).

After the second operation, the deceased still did not have a urology well, and on June 28, 2009, there was no urology even after removal of the urology included in the urology inserted in the second operation. On July 13, 2009, the deceased discharged the urology from the Defendant hospital in the state with urology, urology, and walking disorder, and thereafter, the state of urology, urology, and walking disability was worse and worse to the extent that it is difficult to lead a daily life.

As the deceased and the Plaintiff B (hereinafter “the deceased, etc.”) who was the son of the deceased during the process of the instant preceding lawsuit caused a disability to the deceased due to the negligence of the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital, the Defendant was “the deceased.”