logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.05.14 2014가합28029
손해배상(의)
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff B’s KRW 43,069,694, Plaintiff C, and Plaintiff D, respectively, KRW 11,714,285 and each of the above amounts.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff B is the deceased’s spouse of the deceased (hereinafter “the deceased”), and Plaintiff C and Plaintiff D are the deceased’s children.

나. 망인은 구강 내 이물감 등으로 피고 병원에 내원하여 2013. 7. 3. 혀 부위 조직검사 및 그 다음날 경부(頸部) CT(컴퓨터 단층촬영) 검사 결과, 설암(舌癌) 1기로 진단되어 2013. 7. 18. 피고 병원에 입원하였다.

C. From around 12:30 on July 19, 2013 to 16:30, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital carried out humbling to the deceased on the right side, humbling to the right side side, humbling to the right side, and humbling to the right right side (hereinafter “instant surgery”), and inserted humbling on the part of the surgery (e.g., g., blood, etc. attached to the humvac, or blood, etc. newly generated after the surgery).

At around 14:50 on July 20, 2013, the Deceased showed symptoms, such as respiratory difficulty and outpatients, around 15:55 on the same day. Accordingly, the medical personnel at the Defendant hospital provided first aid to the Deceased, such as oxygen supply and chest pressure, and then discharged blood by cutting the part of the surgery performed against the Deceased at around 16:1 on the same day, and then transferred the Deceased to the patient room at around 16:30 on the same day.

E. On November 25, 2013, the Deceased was killed at around 23:05 on June 29, 2014, while he/she was receiving treatment in the state of low oxygen brain damage and others.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 7, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. 1) Whether the Defendant hospital violated the duty to explain (i) the occurrence of liability for damages, and the Plaintiffs asserted that the Plaintiff was negligent in failing to fulfill the duty to explain on the following grounds: (a) whether the Defendant hospital’s medical personnel did not have blood transfusion after the surgery, or when the blood species occur; (b) it could cause respiratory difficult to occur due to pressure; and (c) it could also cause low oxygen brain injury or death; and (d) thus, (e) the Defendant hospital’s medical personnel evidence No. 1.

arrow