1. The remaining amount after deducting the expenses for the auction from the proceeds of the sale by selling the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

The Plaintiff and the Defendants owned the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) in proportion to each share indicated in the separate sheet, and there was no agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendants regarding the method of dividing the instant real estate.

[In light of the fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings] The location, area and utilization status of the real estate of this case known by the purport of the whole pleadings, use value, share ratio of co-owners, etc., it is reasonable to divide the real estate of this case into price as it is inappropriate to divide the partition of co-owned property by the spot

Therefore, the real estate of this case is sold to the plaintiff and the defendants according to the ratio of each share sheet to the amount remaining after deducting the auction cost from the price of the real estate sold by auction.