1. The remaining amount of each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 which is put for auction and the auction cost is deducted from the price;

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs and the Defendants shared each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 list at the ratio of co-owners and share indication.

B. As of the closing date of the instant pleadings, there was no agreement between the Plaintiffs and the Defendants on the method of dividing each of the said real estate.

[Ground for Recognition] Unsatisfy, each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 3 (including a tentative number)

2. According to the judgment, co-owners can claim the partition of the co-owned property. If the agreement on the method of partition does not lead to agreement on the method of partition, co-owners may claim the partition to the court. The partition of co-owned property according to the judgment is, in principle, impossible by the method of partition in kind or in kind, it is possible in form.

Even if the price of the article jointly owned is likely to be significantly reduced due to it, it shall be the so-called method of payment by ordering the auction of the article jointly owned to divide the price. In the case of this case, considering the accessibility to each road after the division, the form of the division part, etc., it seems that it is difficult or inappropriate to divide the co-owned property by the method of in-kind division, and it is the most equitable and reasonable method to divide the price through auction.

3. In conclusion, each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 is sold at auction and distributed at the ratio of co-ownership after deducting the auction cost from the price. It is so decided as per Disposition by the court below.