1. The amount remaining after deducting the expenses for the auction from the price of each real estate listed in the attached Table 1 sold at an auction;

The Plaintiff and the Defendants owned each real estate listed in the separate sheet 1 (hereinafter “instant real estate”) in proportion to their respective shares listed in the separate sheet 2 attached hereto, and the fact that the agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendants on the method of dividing the instant real estate has not been reached is not a dispute between the parties.

In light of the location, area, utilization status, use value, co-owner's share ratio, etc. of the real estate of this case known by the purport of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 and 2 and the whole pleadings, it is reasonable to divide the real estate of this case into price as it is inappropriate to divide the co-owned property by the spot-sale method.

Therefore, the real estate of this case shall be sold to the plaintiff and the defendants according to the ratio of each of the attached Table 2 attached hereto, which was put up for auction and deducted the auction cost.