1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is operating the “Cottleneck Institute” (hereinafter “instant private teaching institute”) in Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Jung-gu.

B. On January 8, 2016, the Defendant publicly announced “a plan for the certification evaluation of vocational skills development training institutions for the year 2016” (hereinafter “instant public announcement”).

The evaluation of certification according to the public notice of this case shall be conducted at two levels as shown below. The defendant shall conduct the evaluation of certification in accordance with the above public notice as "Korea Institute of Technology Education"; hereinafter referred to as "Korea Institute of Technology Education".

the agency. The agency has made the agent.

Classification 1-Class 2 evaluation of the soundness of the institution, 2-Class 1 evaluation of the management of the institution in charge of the evaluation of the quality of the institution, the ability to conduct training, and the overall evaluation of the institution subject to evaluation of the total evaluation of additional points, written evaluation of the methods of evaluation of the institution subject to evaluation, participation in field evaluation-

C. On February 5, 2016, the Plaintiff applied for the certification evaluation of a training institution to the Korea Technology Education University. On March 7, 2016, the Korea Technology Education University: (a) conducted a written evaluation (institutional soundness evaluation) on the instant private teaching institute; (b) assessed the instant private teaching institute as a total point of 42; and (c) notified the Plaintiff of its suitability.

On July 27, 2016, the Korea Technology Education University visited the instant private teaching institute to conduct a field evaluation and conducted a capability evaluation as follows. On August 31, 2016, the Defendant, along with the result of the following evaluation on the Vocational Skills Development Information Network (HD-Net), published the instant private teaching institute’s evaluation grade as “Suspension of Certification”.

(hereinafter referred to as the "disposition in this case"). The capability evaluation point (hereinafter referred to as "the Disposition in this case") . 2 points (5 points) point for the head of an agency managing agency .6.2 points for sustainability 6.2 points (5 points) . development and operation of training training courses 1.8 points (22 points) training infrastructure .6.8 points (17 points) training infrastructure and operation 6.4 points (16 points) training .8 points (20 points) training .7.6 points for consumers evaluation 6.4 points (20 points).

E. On September 8, 2016, the Plaintiff.