Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 24, 2018, Defendant A does not occur in front of the “D” located in Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si.

“The police officers, at the police station affiliated with the military police station called 112 reported, recommended the Defendant to return home, and the police officers, such as the chief E, etc. of the police station called 112, expressed the above police officers’ desire to “I am home, I h,” and assaulted the chest part of the above E one time by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of police officers' 112 reports and the maintenance of public peace and order.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties was arrested by a flagrant offender at the time, place, and at the same time, at the same time and place as described in paragraph (1) and on board the patrol vehicle. The Defendant was arrested by a flagrant offender at the same time and place as described in paragraph (1) 1, and was on board the patrol vehicle.

“E was unable to move while speaking as “,” and as the above E prevented the Defendant, it was assaulted by hand by force the shoulder and lusium, etc. of E.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning police officers' 112 reporting duties and arrest of flagrant offenders.

B. Around 21:20 on June 24, 2018, the Defendant, who attempted to damage public goods, was arrested as a flagrant offender and was on board the back seat of the F patroler, which is a case of public goods, and was moved to the lower seat of the F patroler, which is a case of the goods for public use. In the course of movement, the Defendant stated that “this m. . . . . . . . .” to the police officer, who was carrying the Defendant at the vicinity of the police box located in the military patrol station located in the military patrol station at the time of Mapopopo-si, and tried to remove the police officer, who was on board together, tried to damage the right right side of

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Each statement of I, J and K;

1. A report on investigation and an investigation (2 beams);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the image of crime of the victim;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act and subparagraph A of the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 136 of the Criminal Act.