Of the parts concerning the counterclaim of the first instance judgment, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) who exceeds the amount ordered to be paid below.

The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff and the defendant citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, except for those emphasizing or adding the following arguments in the court of first instance. In full view of the evidence submitted to the court of first instance and this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified except

Accordingly, the court's explanation on the instant case is as follows.

Part as described in the paragraph shall be written, and the following subparagraph 2(b) shall not apply:

Except for the addition of "additional Judgment" as described in the paragraph, it is identical to that of the judgment of the first instance, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Judgment

(a) The first instance court's decision: 30% of the net construction cost (won), 1,034,609 2nd office outside the building; 1,52nd office outside the building; 254,683 32nd office; 503,310 46,310 166,970 51 to 2nd office; 37. 40% of the total construction cost (won) ; 30,5000 62nd office outside the building; 30,5000 62nd office outside the building; 30,5000 62nd office outside the building; 30,5000 62nd office outside the building; 30,5000 6th office building; 1,609,000 7nd office outside the building; 1,606, 360,000 square meters of reinforced concrete structures outside the wall, 360,2750,27, and