logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.11.17 2016고단1366
축산물위생관리법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From November 2015 to March 2016, the Defendant slaughtered 10 marine 10 marine at the place of work within the livestock shed located in Y in Yacheon City without obtaining permission from the Mayor/Do governor.

Accordingly, the Defendant slaughtered and treated livestock at a place other than the permitted place of work.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on screen pictures and CDs at the scene of crime;

1. Article 45 (1) 1 and Article 7 (1) of the Sanitary Control of Livestock Products Act applicable to facts constituting an offense, Articles 45 (1) 1 and 7 (1) of the same Act

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Part not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who slaughters and treats livestock, such as black salt, at the livestock shed located in Ma in netcheon-si D.

From April 4, 2013 to April 27, 2016, at the workplace of the said livestock shed, the Defendant, which was slaughtered in the YF located in the YF located in the YF located in the YF located in the field of the livestock shed located in the YF located in the YF located in the YF, 74,100,000 won, and 62,668,350 won of the market price purchased in the YF, which was 62,68,350 won of the f2,000 won of the f2,668,000 won of the black salt and cut off by parts.

Accordingly, the Defendant slaughtered and treated livestock at a place other than the permitted place of work.

2. The evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant slaughtered or subdivided a number of black chrons as stated in the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant was treated.

Rather, in light of witness G’s testimony, F is difficult to find motive for the Defendant to commit the crime, as stated in the above facts charged, since F, which the Defendant was supplied with black salt, subdivides and processes black salt at the request of the ordering person, and supplies it after subdividing it.

Therefore, this part of the facts charged constitutes a case where there is no proof of crime.

arrow