A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who engages in construction business.

On May 2015, the defendant requested the F who operates E to perform the steel structure and basic construction works, among the new construction works of the Ulsan-gun Factory Construction Project Co., Ltd., Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, which was subcontracted by the party in charge of the dispute resolution, and requested the F to perform part of the steel structure construction works.

In the absence of the settlement of the existing construction cost, the defendant was asked by F F to enter into a direct contract with BAB without consent of G, which is the representative of BAB, and the defendant was willing to prepare and deliver the nominal contract without consent.

1. On June 2015, the Defendant: (a) at a place where it is not possible to know the place where the first-class patroler was located; (b) the former F made up of the construction-based subcontracting contract for the construction-based construction-based construction-based construction-based construction-based construction-based construction-based construction-based construction-based construction-based construction-related construction-related construction-related construction-related construction-related construction-related construction-related construction-related construction-related construction-related construction-related construction-related construction-related construction-related construction-related construction-related construction-related construction-related construction-related contracting company; and (c)

2. On June 6, 2015, the Defendant: (a) issued a copy of the construction standard subcontract agreement to F, as if it were duly formed, at the office of F located in the Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si; and (b) exercised the same.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the F, I, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the written complaint, full certificate of registered matters, copy of the contract, and recording of witness examination;

1. Relevant Articles 231, 234, and 231 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing criteria (the range of recommendations) shall be the one type (the forgery, alteration, etc. of private documents).