Defendant

A Imprisonment of six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. A. On December 10, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, around 23:10, 2016, on the street in front of the E Commercial Building, “a young person was damaged by breaking up the car,” and “a young person was sent to the site after receiving a report by 112, G’s personal information about the region belonging to the F District of the Incheon Police Station, the Defendant asked the reporter for his/her son’s son’s son’s son, etc., by asking for his/her son’s personal information, and assaulting him/her of his/her left part of G, and arrested him/her as a current offender who interfered with the performance of official duties, and the police officer of the same district was arrested by the Defendant on the vehicle with his/her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s h.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases and arrest of flagrant offenders.

B. On December 10, 2016, around 23:25, the Defendant damaged goods for public use by public offices in order to take a bath, such as “a son, flachie,” at the F District of the Docheon Police Station, Incheon City, Inc., located in I, and damaged goods used by public offices in order to reduce the repair cost by 3-4 times from walking a string of a c-4 cut-off, thereby falling into a c-5,00 won.

2. On December 10, 2016, Defendant B, at the place indicated in No. 1-A around 23:13 on December 13, 2016, on the ground that the Defendant arrested Defendant A, a flagrant offender, at the places indicated in Defendant B’s paragraph (a), was able to catch up the parts of the above G, etc., and the Defendant assaulted Defendant B, at one time, on the floor of the marier’s hand, by taking advantage of the J’s chest.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement to G, J and K;

1. Each statement of L and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (the attitude A of a suspect), report on internal investigation (the attachment of a motion picture to a product damaged for public use), report on internal investigation (the confirmation of a hospital, medical treatment, and estimate);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and the Criminal Act.