1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On January 6, 2010, C filed a lawsuit claiming the payment of loans of KRW 37 million and damages for delay against the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s former wife (hereinafter “ separate lawsuit”) with Busan District Court Branch Branch Decision 2010Kadan233.

B. While the Plaintiff filed an application for a separate lawsuit, the said court rendered a decision on the legal aid for the attorney’s fee to the Plaintiff. Accordingly, on August 13, 2010, the Plaintiff appointed the Defendant, who is an attorney-at-law, as his/her attorney, as his/her attorney. After doing so, the Defendant filed a separate lawsuit as his/her attorney.

C. C: (1) On November 30, 199, KRW 10 million (as of July 30, 200), ② on June 29, 200, KRW 5 million (as of December 29, 200), ③ on October 22, 200, KRW 5 million (as of December 29, 200), ④ on September 22, 2001, KRW 15 million (as of September 21, 2002, KRW 205,00,000,000 as a witness of the Plaintiff’s Housing Act (as of March 21, 200), and KRW 205,00,000,000,000 for each of the said loans (as of March 21, 200), were alleged as having been used as a witness of the Plaintiff’s Housing Act, and KRW 205,500,000,00,000 for each of the loans).

Meanwhile, on April 8, 2010, the Plaintiff asserted that “a loan claimed by C was lent by D, the former wife, and was used for a non-limited consumption for consumption without restriction, such as entertainment expenses, and the Plaintiff merely borrowed money claimed by C, but the Plaintiff merely borrowed five million won from C,” which was presented by the Defendant.