The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

According to its reasoning, the court below determined as follows: (a) the Defendant, an attorney-at-law in the case of loans 2010Kadan233, filed by C against the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s former wife, was in violation of the duty of care and good faith as an attorney-at-law in the course of rendering a separate lawsuit as the Plaintiff’s attorney-at-law in the process of rendering a separate lawsuit; (b) the Defendant did not assert a defense as to the completion of extinctive prescription of commercial claims as to the loans as of September 22, 2001, as alleged in the reasoning of its reasoning.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles, the lower court’s aforementioned determination is justifiable.

In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence by violating logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on extinctive prescription of commercial claims and the

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.