National Public Transport and Services Trade Union (Attorney Dong-hwan, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Geumnam Transportation Co., Ltd. and six others (Law Firm New Daily, Attorneys Lee Han-hun, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

January 12, 2017

Daejeon District Court Decision 2016Gahap10052 Decided October 19, 2016

1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff and the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

1. Purport of claim

가. 원고에게, 피고 계룡뻐스 주식회사는 계룡뻐스분회를, 피고 동건운수 주식회사는 동건운수분회를, 피고 충진교통 주식회사는 충진교통분회를 위하여 각 피고의 사업장 내 적당한 장소에 노동조합 사무실과 비품 및 필요한 통신시설을 대여하라.

나. 피고 금남교통운수 주식회사, 계룡뻐스 주식회사, 동건운수 주식회사, 충진교통 주식회사는 원고에게 각 2,000만 원, 피고 산호교통 주식회사, 선진교통 주식회사, 선진여객 주식회사는 각 1,000만 원 및 이에 대한 이 사건 소장 부본 송달 다음날부터 다 갚는 날까지 연 15%의 비율로 계산한 금원을 지급하라.

2. Purport of appeal

A. The plaintiff

제1심판결 중 아래에서 구하는 부분에 해당하는 원고 패소부분을 취소한다. 원고에게, 피고 계룡뻐스 주식회사는 계룡뻐스분회를, 피고 동건운수 주식회사는 동건운수분회를, 피고 충진교통 주식회사는 충진교통분회를 위하여 각 피고의 사업장 내 적당한 장소에 노동조합 사무실과 비품 및 필요한 통신시설을 대여하라. 피고 금남교통운수 주식회사, 계룡뻐스 주식회사, 동건운수 주식회사, 충진교통 주식회사는 원고에게 각 1,000만 원, 피고 산호교통 주식회사, 선진교통 주식회사, 선진여객 주식회사는 각 500만 원 및 이에 대한 이 사건 소장 부본 송달 다음날부터 다 갚는 날까지 연 15%의 비율로 계산한 금원을 지급하라.

B. The Defendants

The part of the first instance judgment against the Defendants shall be revoked. The Plaintiff’s claim corresponding to the revocation part shall be dismissed in entirety.

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

The reasoning of this Court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except as stated in the following 2.1. Thus, this Court’s explanation is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. Parts to be removed or added;

The part of the 7th judgment of the court of first instance (the agreement of May 30, 2014) of the 7th (the "representative bargaining union" is referred to as "representative bargaining union".

Part 5 through 8 of the 9th judgment of the court of first instance [Attachment 3-2] of the 9th judgment of the court of first instance is as follows.

Although the number of union members of a small-scale labor union reaches 47% to 17%, it is difficult to recognize the rationality to not provide a labor union with a labor union for the sole reason that it is not a representative labor union, without considering the fact entirely.

The "date of the closure of argument of this case" of 10 to 11 of the 000th judgment of the court of first instance shall be "date of the closure of argument of this case".

○○ Decision No. 22, 10 through 11, the term “the date of sentence” of the first instance judgment shall be deemed to read “the date of sentence of the first instance judgment”.

3. Conclusion

The plaintiff's claim shall be accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance with the same conclusion is justifiable, and all appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendants are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Lee Dong-jin (Presiding Judge)