A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 7, 2018, at the E convenience point where the victim D works in Busan, Seo-gu, Busan, the Defendant would be aware that the victim would not sell goods from the victim F, who is the business owner at his/her place of business, to the Defendant that he/she would not sell goods. He/she would like to say that he/she would have her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her shes.

I hear the end of the president of the male president.

The bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch. The bitch bitch Poch xch bitch ZT C&C kn at hand.

The president of the French Republic of Korea has broken down by falling off 1 bottled 1 to the floor by cutting off 2,340 won of the market price of the victim, which is owned by the victim in the calculation stand by hand, with sound.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim D and damaged the victim F's property.

2. Before April 16, 2018, the Defendant, at the above convenience store around 08:15, expressed the victim D with a warrant of release to the detention center, and “Sew or detention house was home.”

There have been about 10 days ago, and there has been a reductioner.

1.3 Does not be able to be able to be able to

(b) the same shall not apply to any person.

The president of the width called “Bom D before the test,” and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D or F;

1. Relevant Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes seem to have shown that the defendant several difficulties were committed at the convenience store where the victim works, even before the crime of this case. Considering the defendant's military power, the risk of recidivism is very high, the victims are not good, and the victims want to be punished, the crime during the period of probation, and the defendant is a criminal act during the period of probation, and the police officer is insulting or insulting during the period of probation.