1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. On September 26, 201, the Defendant committed against the Plaintiff on September 26, 201 with respect to the amount of KRW 2,314 square meters in Pyeongtaek-si.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The court's explanation concerning this part of the cited judgment of the court of first instance is as follows.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal, deletion, or addition in this paragraph. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence

B. Each “Defendant B District Urban Development Project Association (hereinafter “Defendant Association”)”, “Defendant Association”, “Defendant Association”, “Defendant Association”, “Land Substitution 16”, “Land Substitution 16,” “Land Substitution 18,” and “Defendant Pyeongtaek-si 18,” respectively, shall be deemed to be “Defendant”, “Land Substitution 16,” “Land Substitution 18,” respectively.

Each "Defendant" shall be deleted from 3rd, 7th, 10th, and 15th, respectively.

The second 18th 18th of the judgment of the court of first instance added "on the basis of the appraisal results" (hereinafter referred to as "the appraisal of this case") and the second 19 second 19 second 19 "the land substitution plan of this case" (hereinafter referred to as "the land substitution plan of this case").

2. Judgment as to the defendant's main defense against the main claim

A. After the lapse of the period for filing a lawsuit, the defendant asserts that this part of the lawsuit is unlawful, even if the period for filing the lawsuit expires.

On April 24, 2012, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit including the part seeking revocation of the instant disposition, even more than 90 days after becoming aware of the instant disposition.

B. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff’s assertion is within 90 days from the date of becoming aware of the instant disposition, and the part concerning the price disposal of the instant land in the instant land substitution plan (hereinafter “price assessment”).

) An administrative appeal seeking revocation was filed (hereinafter “instant administrative appeal”).

Since then, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit within 90 days from the date of receiving the original copy of the written adjudication on the instant administrative appeal.