1. The plaintiff's claim that is changed in exchange in the trial is dismissed.

2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The court's explanation of this case is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

"At the time of writing" in the second fifth fifth of the judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase "at the end," and the phrase "at the third third sixth of the judgment of the court of first instance" was read as "at the end," and the phrase "at the end, on June 30, 2016, the term of prohibition of the plaintiff's departure was extended from May 26, 2016 to November 25, 2016," and the phrase "the ground for recognition" was added to "the evidence of subparagraph 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance" to "the ground for recognition" to the third eighthth of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the plaintiff's request that a change in exchange from the court of first instance changed from the court of first instance is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.