logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.12.20 2018고정1091
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around December 12, 2017, the Defendant and B had the victim C, the Defendant’s seat of the Defendant, opened the cell phone under their name, opened the cell phone, and sold the cell phone to divide the price into two parts. The Defendant conspiredd to play a so-called “furst” role, such as making the victim feel false when the Defendant personally paid the value of the cell phone, and allowing the victim to open the cell phone under the name of the victim; and B, when the Defendant acted as above, to do so.

Accordingly, on December 12, 2017, the Defendant had been well aware of the victims of the E mobile phone agency located in Gwangju Northern-gu, Seoul, due to the lack of the results of sales of Handphones while attending the company.

Although a contract for the opening of four mobile phones in the name of ap, the fee and the value of equipment will be responsible for and solved.

The purpose of Section B is different from that of Section B, and Section B said, “I Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do d. d.”

However, at the time, the Defendant did not have any income from the job, and even if opening the mobile phone under the name of the victim, there was no intention or ability to pay the mobile phone price in time, and B was well aware of the aforementioned circumstances.

Nevertheless, on December 13, 2017, the Defendant and B conspired to induce the victim to open a mobile phone in the name of the victim, and did not pay for the amount of KRW 1,360,700 of the mobile phone in the name of the victim, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to the same amount, as stated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, and acquired financial benefits equivalent to KRW 5,442,80,00 in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect B by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement with respect to C and F;

1. An inquiry report on credit assessment;

1. Documents pertaining to the opening of Handphones;

1.Each.

arrow