logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.08.11 2017고정1536
무고
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around August 13, 2015, the Defendant agreed to open three mobile phones in the name of the Defendant, but the Defendant did not pay the installment of the mobile phone and did not pay the installment of the mobile phone.

At the time of paying the above installment of the device, the defendant heard the warning that if the crime of forging private document is recognized with respect to the opening of the mobile phone from the employees of the communications company at the time of the payment of the installment of the device, he could receive the payment of the installments of the device, etc., and tried to make a false complaint that B used the name of the defendant and arbitrarily opened the

On March 8, 2016, the Defendant drafted a false complaint with respect to B at the police station of the Pakistan, which is 140, ever 140, in the case of the Gyeonggi-Pak.

The complaint is that the defendant Eul, who was the defendant, was opened in the name of only one cell phone due to the performance of the defendant Eul around August 2015, and that he was able to pay the communication cost or the time limit value of the mobile phone, and he was able to find out his identification card only, and settle it only for three months, so far, he will open three cell phones and claim for the communication fee exceeding three million won.

The content and fact of “” was that the Defendant allowed B to open three mobile phones in the name of the Defendant.

Nevertheless, the defendant filed a written complaint with a police officer who could not know his name at the police station in the same day on the same day for the purpose of having B receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 156 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 156 of the Criminal Act selecting a fine, and the choice of

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow