logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.04.09 2019고단2280
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and four months, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of six months.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Common Criminal Power] Defendant A was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the Suwon District Court’s Ansan Branch on January 24, 2019, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 19, 2019. Defendant B was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on June 11, 2019 to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Military Service Act by the Suwon District Court on June 11, 2019, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 19.

"2019 Highest 2280"- Defendant A

1. Crimes against victims D;

A. On April 18, 2018, the Defendant stated that “A mobile phone is needed to be delivered at home” to the victim D at the G chain store located within the building No. e., the building No. e., the E-building No. 1333 in the following cities: “A mobile phone is not made; however,, a mobile phone cannot be made at home, and if a mobile phone is opened through the opening of a mobile phone under four names, the Defendant would pay the mobile phone value and the mobile phone fee.”

However, even if the defendant had the victim open the cell phone and received it, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the mobile phone price or the mobile phone fee.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim take part in Samsung Gal ju City equivalent to the market value of Samsung 1,036,000, and received delivery.

(2) On April 19, 2018, the Defendant told the victim D to “a number of mobile phones are needed to make a mobile phone to be delivered at the home. However, since the Defendant could not make a mobile phone with bad credit standing, the Defendant would pay the mobile phone value and the mobile phone fee in the four names.”

However, even if the defendant had the victim open the cell phone and received it, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the mobile phone price or the mobile phone fee.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim take 794,500 won of the market value, and had the victim take jugalian 8 (I).

(3) The Defendant is located in the following cities around April 19, 2018.

arrow