logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.05.22 2018고단6644
공갈등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From around 2014, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant, when working in a large retailer, sold food with the expiration of the circulation period, was subject to administrative disposition, such as business suspension and imposition of administrative fines, and thus, the Defendant was aware of the fact that there was a civil petition for the purchase of the product with the expiration of the circulation period. Based on such circumstances, the Defendant: (a) purchased food with the expiration of the distribution period on nearby large retailer; and (b) purchased the same food to the large retailer after the expiration of the distribution period; (c) demanded employees in charge of the large retailer to compensate for the purchase of the product with the expiration of the distribution period; and (d) asked employees in charge of the large retailer to receive money by providing the relevant administrative agency, if not complying with the request.

Accordingly, on February 27, 2018, the Defendant purchased the victim E (the 45 years of age) who is the employee in charge of the D store customer service team from the expiration of the distribution period to the expiration of the distribution period by the aforementioned method, as if he purchased the victim E (the 45 years of age) from the D store customer service team on February 27, 2018. The Defendant stated that he was aware of how he was responsible, how he was responsible, how he was responsible, and how he was charged with the sale of the food after the expiration of the distribution period, and that he did not receive a total of KRW 600,000,000 in cash from the victims, and that he did not receive a total of KRW 80,000 from the victim from April 20, 2017 to April 28, 2018.

Accordingly, the defendant has contributed to the victims and contributed to the property.

arrow