beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s disposition of the suspension of business on July 25, 2014 against the Plaintiff shall be revoked on July 25, 2014.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. At around September 1997, the Plaintiff had been engaged in food manufacturing and processing business, wholesale business, retail business, cooking food and food additives manufacturing business, wholesale business, retail business, and other incidental business related thereto with the permission of the Defendant.
B. From June 10, 2014 to June 13, 2014, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety Promotion Group manufactured xx 65,935 ggg from January 25, 2013 to May 28, 2014 with the Plaintiff’s sanitary inspection conducted with respect to the Plaintiff. On January 19, 2013 and May 31, 2013, the Plaintiff discovered that he/she again purchased at a registered food manufacturing and processing business entity A as a raw material to use a total of 4,020 g of the horse-end fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat
C. Accordingly, on July 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) manufactured and sold products using raw materials manufactured at a non-registered food manufacturing and processing business establishment; (b) stored the products for which the distribution period has elapsed by using raw materials; and (c) violated the requirements to meet the raw materials (e.g., miscellaneous waste, general miscellaneous waste, miscellaneous waste, lighting, and e.g., recording and management of screening and screening work of the foreign products; and (b) violated Articles 4, 7, 42, and 44 of the Food Sanitation Act on the ground that the Plaintiff violated the aforementioned provisions; (c) the business suspension period of two months in relation to the above provisions; and (c) the order of immediate correction was issued in relation to the above provisions.
(hereinafter “instant disposition”) D.
The Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal with the Chungcheongbuk-do Administrative Appeals Commission on August 7, 2014, but the said claim was dismissed on September 12, 2014.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence No. 3, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. This.