Defendant

A, Defendant B, and Defendant E are punished by a fine of KRW 1,00,000,00, Defendant C is punished by a fine of KRW 5,00,00, and Defendant D.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a member of the Gyeonggi-do Livestock Cooperative and a person who operates the K farm in the J of Macheon-si.

The defendant conspiredd with a veterinarian, a sales intermediary, with a view to receiving 50% of the government subsidies from a veterinarian or a sales intermediary.

On September 5, 2012, the Defendant: (a) issued a false medical certificate (a) that only the serial number of the Defendant’s milch (e.g., L) was possible to be slaughtered in an emergency after informing the veterinarian of the instant serial number by telephoneing the veterinarian; and (b) prepared a false contract for sale for the purpose of submitting to the insurance company, even though the Defendant did not actually sell non-permanent cattle to N in the sale, and received on September 10, 2012, by affixing the photograph of the damaged agricultural insurance company, the Defendant’s milch (e.g., L) was affixed to the damaged agricultural company, the Defendant was not a non-permanent cattle.

Therefore, it received total of KRW 1,896,150 from the injured insurance company that believed this as a genuine document and received total of KRW 786,50 from the injured insurance company on September 18, 2012, such as receiving KRW 786,550 as the insurance money for livestock accidents.

In this respect, livestock disaster insurance money was acquired through illegal means.

2. Defendant B is a member of the Gyeonggi-do Livestock Cooperative and a person who operates a P farm in Macheon-siO.

The defendant conspiredd with a veterinarian, a sales intermediary, with a view to receiving 50% of the government subsidies from a veterinarian or a sales intermediary.

A. On January 7, 2013, the Defendant, within the P farm located in Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-si, and the fact that the milch (this card number: Q) owned by the Defendant was shipped out normally, was not a non-permanent cattle, but was issued a false medical certificate (the injury) that an emergency can be slaughtered after informing the veterinarian R of only the number of the lawsuit by calling for the phone, and that there was no fact that the Defendant actually sold the non-permanent cattle to S for sale.